Comments on: What happened to the History Channel? http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/ The unexamined life isn't worth living ~Socrates Sun, 23 May 2010 10:19:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Mike Fremaux http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-136 Mike Fremaux Sun, 23 May 2010 10:19:39 +0000 http://manyhatsonemask.com/?p=154#comment-136 Better questions would be, "What is the HC's new agenda and why?" and "Who owns the HC?" Better questions would be, “What is the HC’s new agenda and why?” and “Who owns the HC?”

]]> By: Darryl L. Pierce http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-135 Darryl L. Pierce Sat, 22 May 2010 17:13:54 +0000 http://manyhatsonemask.com/?p=154#comment-135 Care to offer a citation to support your claim? Care to offer a citation to support your claim?

]]> By: Darryl L. Pierce http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Darryl L. Pierce Sat, 22 May 2010 17:13:23 +0000 http://manyhatsonemask.com/?p=154#comment-134 Well said. I just happened to turn this show on today since von Daniken is one of the most amusing incredulists I've watched. It's so frustrating to watch people being presented as authorities who can only support their assertions with "it's the only thing that makes sense". They act as though, prior to the pyramids, nobody had ever built anything and that the knowledge to build just appeared to them. Well said.

I just happened to turn this show on today since von Daniken is one of the most amusing incredulists I’ve watched. It’s so frustrating to watch people being presented as authorities who can only support their assertions with “it’s the only thing that makes sense”. They act as though, prior to the pyramids, nobody had ever built anything and that the knowledge to build just appeared to them.

]]> By: Ben Oliver http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-132 Ben Oliver Wed, 12 May 2010 22:52:47 +0000 http://manyhatsonemask.com/?p=154#comment-132 When they say the longest lines of latitude and longitude, they mean the lines of latitude and longitude that cover the most land. i.e. if you ran over these lines, you would get the least wet than any other pair of lines. When they say the longest lines of latitude and longitude, they mean the lines of latitude and longitude that cover the most land. i.e. if you ran over these lines, you would get the least wet than any other pair of lines.

]]> By: Thomas Wagner http://manyhatsonemask.com/2009/06/what-happened-to-the-history-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Thomas Wagner Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:42:07 +0000 http://manyhatsonemask.com/?p=154#comment-91 I agree! And more: I wish they continue covering these issues but actually coming up with critical research on those allegations - why do WE have to go figure that the longitude / latitude thing is bullshit...?!? I actually came across this blog googling to find out in what way it could be the longest longitude not being on the equator (not to speak of the latitude thing...) I agree! And more:
I wish they continue covering these issues but actually coming up with critical research on those allegations – why do WE have to go figure that the longitude / latitude thing is bullshit…?!?
I actually came across this blog googling to find out in what way it could be the longest longitude not being on the equator (not to speak of the latitude thing…)

]]>